Tariff Filing of Green Mountain Power Corporation for Approval of an Energy Storage System Tariff and Tariff Filing of Green Mountain Power Corporation for Approval of a Bring Your Own Device Tariff

Case No. 19-3167-TF, Case No. 19-3537-TF, 2020 WL 2753933 (2020)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tariff Filing of Green Mountain Power Corporation for Approval of an Energy Storage System Tariff and Tariff Filing of Green Mountain Power Corporation for Approval of a Bring Your Own Device Tariff

Vermont Public Utilities Commission
Case No. 19-3167-TF, Case No. 19-3537-TF, 2020 WL 2753933 (2020)

Facts

Green Mountain Power Corporation (GMP) (plaintiff) was a monopoly distribution utility with exclusive control over the infrastructure that delivered electricity to a Vermont area. GMP applied to the Vermont Public Utility Commission (commission) for the approval of two tariffs. The Energy Storage System (ESS) tariff allowed up to 500 GMP customers per year to lease new ESS systems from GMP. The system consisted of two Tesla batteries and a gateway device installed in a customer’s home. Electricity from the batteries could provide backup power to the home during power outages but could also be used by GMP to reduce demand across the electric grid during peak periods. Under the ESS tariff, participating customers would pay a monthly lease fee of $55 for 120 months or a one-time lease fee of $5,500. Either way, the lease amount was less than the system cost, meaning that GMP was subsidizing the equipment. Alongside the ESS tariff, GMP proposed the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) tariff, which would provide an upfront payment to GMP customers who purchased and installed battery-storage systems from third parties and allowed GMP to access the systems during peak periods. The Vermont Department of Public Service (department) (defendant) opposed the proposed tariffs, arguing that they were not just and reasonable because they (1) placed a disproportionate risk on nonparticipating customers who would ultimately fund GMP’s investments and incentives and (2) unfairly stifled competition from the private sector. It recommended an alternative single pay-for-performance tariff, which would provide compensation to a customer only when energy was used from private batteries during peak demand.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 913,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 913,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 999 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 913,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 999 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership