TAS Rights Management, LLC v. Barber

2016 WL 55333 (2016)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

TAS Rights Management, LLC v. Barber

United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
2016 WL 55333 (2016)

SC

Facts

TAS Rights Management, LLC (TAS) (plaintiff) was the exclusive licensee and administrator of the name and likeness of Taylor Swift and the trademark TAYLOR SWIFT. TAS also was the exclusive licensee of the trademark THE 1989 WORLD TOUR. The trademarks were registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. TAS filed a lawsuit against Jevon Barber and several others (collectively, Barber) (defendants), alleging that Barber sold and distributed Taylor Swift and 1989 World Tour merchandise near the concert venues in which Swift was performing on her tour. TAS asserted that Barber was guilty of trademark infringement, use of a counterfeit mark, trademark dilution, violating the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, and violating the Tennessee Personal Rights Protection Act. TAS sought a permanent injunction. Barber failed to file an answer to the complaint by the deadline to do so. TAS filed a motion for a default judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Trauger, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership