Tate v. Riverboat Services, Inc.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
305 F. Supp. 916 (2004)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Tate and others (plaintiffs) sued Riverboat Services, Inc. (Riverboat) (defendant) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana for unpaid overtime guaranteed by federal maritime laws. Various plaintiffs had filed actions in different courts involving the same claims against Riverboat, and at least two plaintiffs had voluntarily dismissed twice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 41(a)(1). Riverboat failed to file an answer in the instant action. The plaintiffs secured a default judgment for damages of more than $1 million. Riverboat moved to vacate the default six weeks later under FRCP 60(b). Riverboat admitted its failure to file an answer was negligent, but argued the failure should be excused because it was confused over the fact that multiple actions involving the same parties and claims were ongoing.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Moody, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.