From our private database of 32,100+ case briefs...
Taylor v. Barwick
Delaware Superior Court
1997 WL 527970 (1997)
Taylor (plaintiff), an inmate at the Delaware Correctional Center, filed a pro se action against Barwick (defendant), a corrections officer at the facility, alleging that Barwick committed a battery against him. Specifically, Taylor claimed that Barwick poked him on the back with a tree branch. Barwick admitted to making the contact but asserted that the contact was an accident. Instead, Barwick stated that he noticed a stick on the hallway floor outside the dining hall, bent over to pick it up, and as he was standing up, someone called his name, causing him to turn around and the stick to brush up against Taylor. Barwick further stated that he immediately apologized to Taylor for the inadvertent contact. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Quillen, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 583,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 583,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.