Taylor v. Roswell Independent School District
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
713 F.3d 25 (2013)
- Written by Nathan Benedict, JD
Facts
Seth Taylor and four other high school students (plaintiffs) belonged to a religious group called Relentless. In 2009, the group began an outreach campaign at school, distributing candy and other items with religious messages to students and faculty. The Roswell Independent School District (Roswell) (defendant) had two policies regarding distribution of non-school-related materials on campus. A written policy required advance permission to distribute promotional items or advertisements. A long-standing unwritten policy required permission to distribute any non-school-sponsored literature. The Relentless students did not obtain permission but were not disciplined or asked to stop. The distributions did not cause any disruptions. In 2010, Relentless distributed 2,500 small rubber dolls, each of which was attached to a card explaining that the doll was the actual size and weight of a 12-week-old human fetus. Many students pulled the dolls apart, threw parts of them onto the ceilings where they became stuck, threw them at other students, lit them on fire, and otherwise caused disruptions. When the Relentless students announced plans to distribute the dolls again two weeks later, administrators stopped the planned distribution and threatened discipline. On the same day, students were permitted to distribute Valentine’s Day–related items, which did not cause any disruptions. Taylor sued, arguing that prohibiting the doll distribution violated his First Amendment rights. The district court granted summary judgment to Roswell, and Taylor appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Matheson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

