Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

The Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
342 N.W.2d 135 (1984)


Facts

Northland hired Construction Leaders, Inc. (Construction) (defendant), a general contractor, to perform utilities work on Northland’s property. As a guarantee for the work, Northland entered into a surety agreement with Travelers (defendant). The surety agreement provided a performance bond to Northland. Under the performance bond, Travelers agreed to complete performance of the utility work in the event Construction defaulted on its performance obligations. Construction hired The Cretex Companies, Inc. (Cretex) (plaintiff) as a subcontractor on its contract with Northland. Construction later defaulted and failed to complete performance of the utilities contract. Consequently, Construction failed to pay Cretex for the work performed under the subcontract. Cretex brought suit against Construction and Travelers in Minnesota state court. In its suit against Travelers, Cretex argued that it was an intended third party beneficiary of the surety agreement between Travelers and Northland and thus had enforceable rights under the agreement. The trial court agreed and entered judgment for Cretex. Travelers appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Simonett, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Yetra, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 121,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.