The Island Territory of Curaçao v. Solitron Devices, Inc.

489 F.2d 1313 (1973)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

The Island Territory of Curaçao v. Solitron Devices, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
489 F.2d 1313 (1973)

Facts

The Island Territory of Curaçao (Curaçao) (plaintiff) and Solitron Devices, Inc. (Solitron) (defendant), a New York-based manufacturer of electronic products, entered into an agreement under which Curaçao agreed to develop an industrial park including two factory buildings, which Solitron agreed to lease for 20 years and at which Solitron agreed to operate a manufacturing plant, creating jobs in Curaçao. The parties agreed to arbitrate any disputes arising under the contract. Solitron did not enter into a lease agreement or bring its manufacturing operations to Curaçao as promised, claiming that a hike in the minimum wage made performance of the contract impossible. Curaçao commenced arbitration proceedings in Curaçao. Solitron did not participate in the arbitration proceedings but received notice of its progression. The arbitral tribunal issued an award in favor of Curaçao, and Curaçao procured a judgment to enforce the award in Curaçao. Curaçao then filed an action in United States federal district court, seeking recognition and enforcement of the Curaçao arbitration award and judgment. The district court entered judgment in favor of Curaçao, and Solitron appealed, arguing that the judgment on the arbitral award was not enforceable pursuant to Article 53 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules, which permitted enforcement of foreign money judgments, because the law was preempted by the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention), and that the convention did not apply for a variety of reasons. Solitron also argued that even if Article 53 did apply, the judgment should not be enforced because the Curaçao court lacked jurisdiction over Solitron.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Oakes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership