The Lands Council v. McNair
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
537 F.3d 981 (en banc) (2008)
- Written by Melanie Moultry, JD
Facts
The Lands Council (Council) (plaintiff) sued the United States Forest Service (USFS) (defendant), claiming that the USFS had violated the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1600 et seq., by failing to use on-the-ground analysis to analyze the effects of a proposed project on the flammulated owl and its habitat. The Council cited Ecology Center, Inc. v. Austin, 430 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2005), which held that the NFMA required the USFS to conduct on-the-ground analysis of the effects of logging on old-growth forest and post-fire habitats. The holding of Ecology Center was based on Lands Council v. Powell (Lands Council I), 379 F.3d 738, which found that the USFS had violated the NFMA by approving a timber harvest based on spreadsheet models regarding soil quality rather than on-site spot verification of soil quality. The Council moved for a preliminary injunction. The district court denied the motion, and the Council appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reviewed the case to determine whether to uphold Ecology Center.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.