The Original Great American Chocolate Chip Cookie Company v. River Valley Cookies, Ltd.

970 F.2d 273 (1992)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

The Original Great American Chocolate Chip Cookie Company v. River Valley Cookies, Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
970 F.2d 273 (1992)

SH

Facts

In 1985, The Original Great American Chocolate Chip Cookie Co. (Cookie Co.) (plaintiff) entered into a franchise agreement with the Sigels (defendant) for the operation of a Cookie Co. store in a shopping mall in Illinois. Between 1987 and 1991, the Sigels committed a number of material breaches to the franchise agreement. The Sigels failed to furnish insurance certificates indicating that the Cookie Co. was an additional insured on their insurance. The Sigels paid nine invoices late, and on seven occasions sent the Cookie Co. checks that bounced. The Sigels failed the Cookie Co.’s in-store inspections, and an independent auditor found that the Sigels had underreported their gross sales to the effect of dispossessing the Cookie Co. of almost $3,000 in royalties. As a result, the Cookie Co. terminated the franchise agreement, which was permitted in the event of three or more violations within a 12-month period, without the requirement of notice or opportunity to cure. The Sigels nevertheless continued to operate their store and sold cookies using batter not supplied from the Cookie Co. The Cookie Co. sued to enjoin the Sigels’ violation of its trademarks and moved for a preliminary injunction. The Sigels counterclaimed, arguing that the franchise agreement had been terminated in violation of both the franchise agreement and the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act and moved for a preliminary injunction directing the Cookie Co. to restore their franchise. The district court granted the Sigels’ motion and denied that of the Cookie Co. The Cookie Co. appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership