The Queen on the Application of Tony Michael Jimenez v. The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), Her Majesty’s Commissioners for Revenue and Customs
England and Wales Court of Appeal
[2019] EWCA Civ 51 (2019)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Tony Michael Jimenez (plaintiff) was a United Kingdom national. For a period of time, Jimenez had lived in and paid taxes to the United Kingdom. Jimenez then moved and ultimately obtained a residence in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The United Kingdom’s tax authority, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) (defendant), questioned whether Jimenez owed additional taxes to the United Kingdom. The HMRC delivered a formal request for information and documents, called an information notice, to Jimenez in Dubai regarding his potential additional tax liability. Similar to an administrative subpoena under United States law, the information notice required that Jimenez provide the requested information and documents at a location in the United Kingdom. Jimenez filed a proceeding with the England and Wales High Court to quash the information notice, arguing that the HMRC did not have jurisdiction to serve an information notice outside the United Kingdom’s territorial limits because customary international law prevented a state from enforcing its laws in another state without that state’s permission. The High Court agreed and quashed the information notice. The HMRC appealed to the England and Wales Court of Appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Patten, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 913,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 999 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

