Thomas S., by his guardian ad litem, Joyce M. Brooks v. David T. Flaherty

902 F.2d 250 (1990)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thomas S., by his guardian ad litem, Joyce M. Brooks v. David T. Flaherty

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
902 F.2d 250 (1990)

Facts

Thomas S. (plaintiff) obtained class certification from the district court for patients with intellectual disabilities housed in North Carolina public psychiatric hospitals receiving inadequate care. The district court enjoined David Flaherty (defendant), secretary of the Department of Human Resources for North Carolina (the department), after finding that the department had failed to comply with the recommended treatment plans of treating physicians. The court also found that recommendations related to medications, restraints, and living arrangements were not in compliance with professional judgment. Flaherty appealed the district court’s order to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that the department was in compliance with recommended treatment plans and that the court did not defer to the treating doctors. In addition, Flaherty argued that the institutions’ accreditations established a presumption of adequate care.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Butzner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership