From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP
United States Supreme Court
131 S. Ct. 863 (2011)
Eric Thompson (plaintiff) and his fiancée, Miriam Regalado, were both employed by North American Stainless, LP (NAS) (defendant). In February 2003, NAS was notified by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that Regalado had filed an EEOC claim alleging sex discrimination. Three weeks later, NAS fired Thompson. Thompson subsequently filed an EEOC claim and later sued NAS, alleging that NAS fired him in retaliation for Regalado’s EEOC charge. The United States Supreme Court ultimately granted Thompson’s petition for review to determine whether Thompson had standing to sue NAS under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.