Thornburgh v. Abbott
United States Supreme Court
490 U.S. 401 (1989)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Federal prisoners are permitted to receive publications from sources outside the prison, but prison officials are authorized to reject incoming publications found to be detrimental to institutional security or pose a risk of facilitating criminal activity. The Federal Bureau of Prisons promulgates these regulations. Abbott (plaintiff), a prisoner, along with a class of other prisoners, brought suit in federal district court against U.S. Attorney General Richard Thornburgh (defendant) and the Federal Bureau of Prisons on the grounds that the regulations violated the First Amendment. The district court upheld the regulations as constitutional, but the court of appeals reversed. The United States Supreme court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.


