Thornhill v. System Fuels, Inc.
Supreme Court of Mississippi
523 So.2d 983, 99 O. & G.R. 326 (1988)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Hardy and Joseph McLeod conveyed to C. L. Thornhill (plaintiff) an interest in the minerals in a tract of land. The deed stated that the McLeods were conveying “twenty (20) full mineral acres of land of said tract.” The deed reserved for the McLeods bonuses and delay rentals from future oil and gas leases. Thornhill brought suit in chancery court, seeking a declaratory judgment that the interest the McLeods conveyed to Thornhill was an interest in minerals in place. System Fuels, Inc. (System Fuels) (defendant), which operated wells on the land, argued that by reserving bonuses and delay rentals in future oil and gas leases, the McLeods reserved the executive right to lease the mineral interest and thus conveyed to Thornhill only a royalty interest. The chancery court held that the conveyance was of a royalty interest rather than a mineral interest. Thornhill appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hawkins, J.)
Concurrence (Robertson, J.)
Dissent (Lee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.