Thorpe v. Borough of Thorpe

770 F.3d 255 (2014)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thorpe v. Borough of Thorpe

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
770 F.3d 255 (2014)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Jim Thorpe was an Olympic gold medalist who was a member of the Sac and Fox Nation of Oklahoma. When Jim died in 1953, his wife, Patricia Thorpe, arranged for him to be buried in the newly organized borough of Jim Thorpe, Pennsylvania (the borough) (defendant). Jim’s children opposed the burial, wishing him to instead be buried on Sac and Fox tribal land. In 1990 Congress enacted the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) to protect Native American remains and cultural items from institutions that had improperly profited from or exploited Native Americans in the past. Under NAGPRA, museums and federal agencies were required to inventory Native American remains and cultural items, notify the relevant tribes, and return the remains and items upon request. NAGPRA defined museums as any institutions or government agencies that received federal funds and had possession of Native American remains or cultural items. After NAGPRA was enacted, the borough received federal funds. Jim’s son, John Thorpe (plaintiff), filed a lawsuit in federal district court against the borough pursuant to NAGPRA, seeking the return of Jim’s remains to the Sac and Fox Nation. The borough opposed the lawsuit, arguing that it was not a museum. The district court held that the borough was a museum under NAGPRA because it had possession of Jim’s remains and received federal funds. The district court ordered the borough to return Jim’s remains to the Sac and Fox Nation. The borough appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McKee, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership