Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. Forbse

2012 WL 1918866 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. Forbse

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2012 WL 1918866 (2012)

  • Written by Meagan Messina, JD

Facts

Tiffany (NJ) LLC and Tiffany and Company (collectively, Tiffany) (plaintiffs) sued several defendants who had not yet filed appearances in the case, alleging that the defendants willfully used, reproduced, and copied Tiffany’s trademarks when the defendants sold counterfeit products on various websites. The court entered a preliminary injunction ordering expedited discovery from third-party financial institutions, including China Merchants Bank, Bank of China (BOC), and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (collectively, the banks), and enjoining the banks from transferring, disposing of, or secreting any of the defendants’ assets. The banks notified Tiffany that the banks did not hold assets for the defendants, did not have access to or control over accounts not in the United States, and were prohibited by Chinese law from disclosing or freezing accounts in China without prior authorization. The banks moved to modify the preliminary injunction, arguing that the court cannot restrain assets under these circumstances for banks outside the United States. Tiffany filed a cross-motion to compel compliance by the banks with the preliminary injunction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Buchwald, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership