Time-Share Systems, Inc. v. Schmidt
Minnesota Court of Appeals
397 N.W.2d 438 (1986)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Gary Schmidt (defendant) used the services of Time-Share Systems, Inc. (plaintiff) to manage his business accounts and inventory. After a year, Schmidt terminated the agreement and Time-Share demanded that Schmidt return software Time-Share had created for Schmidt. Time-Share sued and asked the court to order Schmidt to return the software. The court granted Time-Share’s order, but Schmidt failed to return the software and later deleted it. The court found Schmidt in civil contempt and ordered him to pay Time-Share costs, attorney’s fees, and $2,500 in damages. Schmidt appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nierengarten, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

