Tip Top Enterprises, Inc. v. Summit Consulting, Inc.
Florida District Court of Appeal
905 So. 2d 201 (2005)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Tip Top Enterprises (Tip Top) (plaintiff), a landscaping company in Miami-Dade County, Florida, had a workers’-compensation insurance policy through Summit Consulting, Inc. (Summit) (defendant). The policy contained a forum-selection clause favoring Polk County. Tip Top notified Summit that one of its workers had been injured on the job and submitted a claim under the policy. Summit denied the claim, stating that Tip Top’s policy had lapsed. Tip Top filed a breach-of-contract action against Summit in Miami-Dade County. Summit submitted an answer containing general denials and filed a motion to dismiss. Summit did not challenge Tip Top’s choice-of-venue in either its answer or its motion to dismiss. Four months later, Summit filed a motion to change venue to Polk County based on the forum-selection clause in Tip Top’s policy. The trial court granted Summit’s transfer motion. Tip Top appealed, arguing that, because Summit did not timely challenge Tip Top’s choice-of-venue in either its answer or motion to dismiss, Summit had waived its right to challenge venue.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wells, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.