Too, Inc. v. Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
213 F.R.D. 138 (2003)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Windstar Apparel, Inc. (Windstar) (defendant) hired Mia DeCaro and Paula Abraham to start a girls sleep-wear division in the company. DeCaro was the designer for the division and created certain designs that are the subject of this litigation. Abraham was the salesperson for the clothing and sold the clothes to retailers, including Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc. (Kohl’s) (defendant). Too, Inc. (Too) (plaintiff) brought suit against Kohl’s and Windstar alleging copyright and trademark infringement based on the designs. Windstar filed a motion for leave to file a third party complaint against DeCaro and Abraham for contribution and indemnification. Windstar had to file a motion for leave to file the third party complaint because it did not file the third party complaint within the ten day window for doing so after it filed its original answer. Windstar alleged that DeCaro and Abraham had knowledge that the designs were copyrighted and trademarked and materially contributed to the alleged infringement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marrero, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.