From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...
Torres v. Speiser
Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division
701 N.Y.S.2d 360 (2000)
Torres (plaintiff), a stockholder in a corporation, sold his shares to Speiser (defendant), another shareholder. Speiser agreed to help Torres establish another business, and promised to establish a corporation that would own that business, the stock of which was to be divided between Torres and Speiser. Torres then claimed that the sale was invalid because the stock price was less than its par value, and that the defect could not be cured by Speiser’s promises for future consideration. Torres moved for partial summary judgment. The lower court denied the motion.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Memorandum decision)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 136,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.