Tower City Grain Co. v. Richman

232 N.W.2d 61 (1975)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
T
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tower City Grain Co. v. Richman

North Dakota Supreme Court
232 N.W.2d 61 (1975)

JW

Facts

On January 2, E.W. Richman, Peter Richman, and Kenneth Richman (defendants) entered an oral contract to sell 10,000 bushels of wheat to Tower City Grain Co. (Tower) (plaintiff). At the time the contract was formed, the parties agreed on a price but did not identify a delivery date. The time of delivery would depend on when the Richmans were able to arrange transportation for the wheat. The Richmans made numerous attempts to set up wheat transportation. Tower told the Richmans to deliver the wheat on July 17. The Richmans refused to deliver the wheat on the basis that Tower’s delay in asking for the delivery amounted to breach of contract. Tower sued the Richmans, seeking specific performance of the contract. The trial court ruled in favor of Tower without making any particular factual findings about why specific performance was appropriate. The Richmans appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pederson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts
Remedies

Key Terms