Township of Washington v. Village of Ridgewood
New Jersey Supreme Court
141 A.2d 308 (1958)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
The village of Ridgewood (defendant) owned property on Van Emburgh Avenue (the site). The site was located partially within Ridgewood and partially within the borough of Ho-Ho-Kus (plaintiff). Although Ridgewood wanted to erect a water tank on the site, this was prohibited by Ho-Ho-Kus’s zoning ordinance. Nevertheless, Ho-Ho-Kus granted a variance allowing Ridgewood to erect a ground-level water tank. However, Ridgewood erected an elevated water tank on the site. Ridgewood could have erected a ground-level water tank but chose not to do so. Ho-Ho-Kus brought suit, contending that Ridgewood was required to remove the elevated water tank from the site. The superior court ordered Ridgewood to remove the tank. Ridgewood appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Weintraub, C.J.)
Concurrence (Heher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.