Trobaugh v. Sondag

668 N.W.2d 577 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Trobaugh v. Sondag

Iowa Supreme Court
668 N.W.2d 577 (2003)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

While Patrick Sondag (defendant) was serving as an assistant county attorney, he signed a complaint charging Charles Trobaugh (plaintiff) with assault and possession of a firearm by a felon. Sondag became an assistant public defender and was assigned to represent Trobaugh. Trobaugh pleaded guilty to displaying a dangerous weapon and possession of a firearm by a felon. Six years later, Trobaugh was convicted of a federal drug offense. Trobaugh’s attorney in the federal case discovered that Sondag had represented Trobraugh on the charges in the complaint Sondag had signed. Sondag’s potential conflict of interest was raised as a ground for postconviction relief, but the action was dismissed as time-barred. Trobaugh’s third application for postconviction relief based on Sondag’s potential conflict of interest was granted. After Trobaugh’s claim pursuant to the Iowa Tort Claims Act was denied, Trobaugh filed a civil legal-malpractice claim. The district court dismissed the suit, holding that Trobaugh’s claims were barred by the two-year statute of limitations because they accrued when Trobaugh first discovered Sondag’s potential conflict of interest.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cady, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership