Trobaugh v. Sondag
Iowa Supreme Court
668 N.W.2d 577 (2003)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
While Patrick Sondag (defendant) was serving as an assistant county attorney, he signed a complaint charging Charles Trobaugh (plaintiff) with assault and possession of a firearm by a felon. Sondag became an assistant public defender and was assigned to represent Trobaugh. Trobaugh pleaded guilty to displaying a dangerous weapon and possession of a firearm by a felon. Six years later, Trobaugh was convicted of a federal drug offense. Trobaugh’s attorney in the federal case discovered that Sondag had represented Trobraugh on the charges in the complaint Sondag had signed. Sondag’s potential conflict of interest was raised as a ground for postconviction relief, but the action was dismissed as time-barred. Trobaugh’s third application for postconviction relief based on Sondag’s potential conflict of interest was granted. After Trobaugh’s claim pursuant to the Iowa Tort Claims Act was denied, Trobaugh filed a civil legal-malpractice claim. The district court dismissed the suit, holding that Trobaugh’s claims were barred by the two-year statute of limitations because they accrued when Trobaugh first discovered Sondag’s potential conflict of interest.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cady, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
