Supreme Court of Nevada
412 P.2d 970 (Nev. 1966)
Tucker (defendant) was charged with murder. On the day of the murder, he had called the police to report that there was a dead man in his house, but that he had been asleep when the murder occurred and had awoken to find the victim lying on the floor. The prosecution sought to introduce evidence of an incident of substantially the same facts that had occurred about six years earlier in Tucker’s house. However, Tucker was never charged with that prior murder (nor was anyone else). The trial court admitted this evidence of the circumstances of the prior murder and as a result Tucker was convicted of the present murder. He appealed on the grounds that the evidence of the prior incident at his house should have been excluded.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Thompson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 201,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.