Tufenkian Import/Export Ventures, Inc. v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
338 F.3d 127 (2003)
In 1995, James Tufenkian (plaintiff) obtained copyright registration for a carpet design entitled Floral Heriz (the Heriz design). Tufenkian created the Heriz design by taking two carpet designs from the public domain and selectively adapting elements from each of the public-domain works. For example, Tufenkian selectively removed certain elements from one of the designs to produce a cleaner overall look and then adapted the frame from the other design. Tufenkian also made the Heriz design asymmetrical by copying only a portion of the symmetrical design of one of the public-domain works. In 1995, a former employee of Tufenkian was hired by Bashian Brothers, Inc. (Bashian) (defendant), a competitor in the carpet business, to design a carpet entitled Bromley 514 (the Bromley design). The Bromley design also incorporated design elements from the same two public-domain works utilized in the Heriz design and used a structural layout that was nearly identical to the Heriz design. Tufenkian brought a copyright-infringement suit in 1999, and the district court found that Tufenkian had a valid copyright in the Heriz design and that the Bromley design had actually copied the Heriz design. However, the court held that the Bromley design was not substantially similar to the protectable elements of the Heriz design and dismissed the infringement claim. Specifically, the court found that Bashian’s copying was limited to unprotectable elements that Heriz had taken from public-domain works and that the original contributions to the Heriz and Bromley designs had resulted in a different look and feel for each design. Tufenkian appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Calabresi, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.