Turnell v. Continental CentiMark Corp.

796 F.3d 656 (2015)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
T
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Turnell v. Continental CentiMark Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
796 F.3d 656 (2015)

SC

Facts

James Turnell (plaintiff) worked for Continental CentiMark Corporation (defendant), a commercial roofing company. Turnell’s contract had a number of covenants restricting his ability to work with a competitor if he left the company. CentiMark fired Turnell, and Turnell began working for a competitor, Windward Roofing and Construction, Inc. CentiMark demanded that Turnell stop working for Windward, but Turnell refused. Turnell sought a declaratory judgment that the restrictive covenants were unenforceable. CentiMark filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, seeking to enjoin Turnell from working for Windward. Turnell testified that he knew of the covenants in his contract, but disregarded them because he needed a job. The district court granted an injunction. Under the district court’s order, Turnell was permitted to continue working for Windward, but could not sell to CentiMark’s customers. Turnell appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kanne, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Remedies

Key Terms