Tyra v. Cheney
Minnesota Supreme Court
152 N.W. 835 (1915)
Cheney (defendant) was the general contractor on a job for repair of a school building. Tyra (plaintiff) wanted to submit a bid as subcontractor on some of the work, but missed the deadline. Tyra provided an informal, oral bid for the work and, although he was told his bid was too late, was instructed to put in a formal bid. Tyra submitted his formal bid, but mistakenly left out an item in the formal bid worth about $1,000. Tyra secured the bid and began work. Tyra brought suit to recover the $1,000 due to the mistake in the formal bid. Cheney denied that it had ever received the informal bid. The claim was tried by a jury, which found in favor of Tyra. Cheney filed an alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The motion was denied. Cheney appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Holt, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.