From our private database of 37,100+ case briefs...
U.S. Aprons, Inc. v. R-Five, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of Nebraska
2010 WL 489540 (2010)
Facts
U.S. Aprons, Incorporated (Aprons) (plaintiff) purchased textiles from R-Five, Incorporated (defendant). Aprons had a problem with the textiles and sued R-Five for breach of several warranties. R-Five claimed that the Worth Street Textile Market Rules (the rules) were incorporated into its contract with Aprons because it was a usage of trade in the textile industry to follow the rules. The rules were not referenced in any purchase orders. Neither Aprons nor the customers of Aprons were aware of the rules. The only evidence that the rules were usage of trade was testimony by an employee of a company owned by R-Five and a reference to the rules on the National Textile Association website. R-Five filed a motion for summary judgment in the district court based on the disclaimer of warranties contained in the rules.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kopf, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.