UFBDH v. Davis County Clerk
Utah Supreme Court
175 P.3d 1036 (2007)
Facts
As part of the 2000 election, Davis County voters voted in favor of a ballot question asking whether the county should add fluoride to the public water supply. Subsequently, certain Davis County voters opposed to fluoridation circulated a petition to place the same question on the ballot for the 2002 election. The Davis County Clerk (defendant) placed the question on the 2002 ballot. Utahns For Better Dental Health-Davis, Inc. (UFBDH) (plaintiff) was a nonprofit organization that advocated for the benefits of fluoride. UFBDH sued the clerk, arguing that it was unconstitutional for him to put the revote question on the ballot. The district court ruled in favor of UFBDH, finding that placing the question on the ballot was a “misuse [of] the people’s direct legislative power.” UFBDH moved for recovery of its attorneys’ fees under the private attorney general, or common-fund exception to the American Rule. The district court denied the motion. UFBDH appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Durham, C.J.)
Dissent (Wilkins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
