Union Carbide Corp. v. American Can Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
724 F.2d 1567, 220 U.S.P.Q. 584 (1984)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Union Carbide Corporation (plaintiff) held a patent on a method of packaging plastic bags for use in the meat-packing industry. The patent was directed to the use of an elongated flexible binding to hold the bags together. Union Carbide brought an infringement action against American Can Company (defendant) in federal district court. The court invalidated Union Carbide’s patent on the ground of obviousness. Union Carbide argued that the prior-art references relied on by the court were directed to the retaining of paper sheets, whereas the Union Carbide patent was directed to the dispensing of bags. However, the court found that the Union Carbide patent dealt with problems of binding and carrying the bags, not just dispensing them, and that the prior art solved the problem in the same way. The case was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nies, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.