Union of India v. Singh Builders Syndicate
India Supreme Court
Civil Appeal Case No. 3632/2207 (2009)
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
The Union of India (India) and Singh Builders Syndicate entered into an agreement containing an arbitration provision. The provision stated that two arbitrators would be appointed. The arbitration provision required that the arbitrators were required to be active Indian government railway officers. One arbitrator would be appointed by the Indian government railway agency Northern Railways, and Singh Builders Syndicate would choose the second arbitrator from a panel of options provided by the general manager of the Northern Railways. The panels provided to Singh Builders Syndicate by the general manager repeatedly listed officers who were scheduled to transfer away soon, which contributed to a nearly 10-year delay in resolving a dispute that arose between the parties. India argued that the appointment of arbitrators could only be conducted under the terms agreed to in the arbitration provision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.