Union Royale Belge des Societes de Football Association ASBL v. Jean-Marc Bosman

Case C-415/93, 1995 ECJ CELEX LEXIS 220, [1995] ECR I-4921 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Union Royale Belge des Societes de Football Association ASBL v. Jean-Marc Bosman

European Court of Justice
Case C-415/93, 1995 ECJ CELEX LEXIS 220, [1995] ECR I-4921 (1995)

SH

Facts

In 1990, Jean-Marc Bosman (plaintiff) was a professional football player in the last year of his contract with RFC Liege, a Belgian football club. Bosman wanted to transfer to USL Dunkerque, a French football club. But when Dunkerque produced what Liege viewed as insufficient funds for a transfer fee, Liege refused to release Bosman. Liege subsequently demoted Bosman to second team, which substantially decreased his playing time and salary. Bosman initiated legal action against Liege, Union Royal Belge de Societes de Football Association ASBL, and other sporting associations, arguing their transfer and nationality rules were inconsistent with Article 48 of the Treaty Establishing the European Communities (EEC Treaty). The Belgian Court of Appeals referred the question of whether Article 48 applied to Bosman’s case to the European Court of Justice.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership