United States ex rel. Antidiscrimination Center of Metro New York, Inc. v. Westchester County

668 F. Supp. 2d 548 (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States ex rel. Antidiscrimination Center of Metro New York, Inc. v. Westchester County

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
668 F. Supp. 2d 548 (2009)

Facts

Westchester County (defendant) applied to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for certain federal funding, including Community Development Block Grants (CDBG). In order to receive CDBG funds, Westchester County was required to certify that the grant would be administered in accordance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fair Housing Act and that Westchester County would affirmatively further fair housing. In order to affirmatively further fair housing, Westchester County was required to conduct an analysis of impediments to fair-housing choices within the county, take steps to overcome the effects of those impediments, and maintain records of its analysis and steps taken. The Anti-Discrimination Center of Metro New York, Inc. (ADC) (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against Westchester County alleging that it violated the False Claims Act through the certifications it made to HUD when applying for federal funding. The ADC filed a motion for summary judgment and alleged that Westchester County failed to follow the requirements of affirmatively furthering fair housing by focusing exclusively on increasing affordable housing within the county and not taking race into account when analyzing impediments to fair housing. Westchester County argued that it did not have to consider race when analyzing impediments to fair housing, but regardless, that it did consider race and found that race was not a significant barrier to fair-housing choice.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cote, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership