United States ex rel. Smithsonian Institution
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Civil Action No. 17-mc-3005 (2021)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
The Smithsonian Institution (Smithsonian) (plaintiff) was a collection of museums created by Congress to increase and diffuse knowledge. In 1920, the Smithsonian acquired 2,241 items from the family of Herbert Ward, a British explorer. The items included nineteen of Ward’s bronze sculptures of the Congolese people, 10 of which were life-sized or larger and weighed approximately 1,000 pounds. The agreement conveying the items to the Smithsonian required that the sculptures always be displayed alongside the rest of the Ward collection and that the collection always be on display to provide educational benefit. The agreement did not specify an alternative disposition of the items if the Smithsonian became unable to comply with the agreement’s requirements. For decades, the Ward items were on permanent display at the National Museum of Natural History (museum). In the 1980s, the museum began receiving criticism that various European items in its African culture displays, including the Ward sculptures, perpetuated negative stereotypes of African culture. It began planning an updated African-culture exhibit. In 2017, the United States (plaintiff) filed a petition on the Smithsonian’s behalf seeking judicial modification of the Ward agreement to remove the continuous-display obligation for the Ward sculptures. It argued the museum’s space constraints and modern policies, as well as the sculptures’ content, made continuous display impracticable. The museum planned to instead have an online exhibit for the Ward collection, which would allow the sculptures to be viewed alongside the rest of the collection and with supplemental information providing necessary context. The district court considered the petition.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chutkan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 926,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,003 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

