United States ex rel. Smithsonian Institution

Civil Action No. 17-mc-3005 (2021)

From our private database of 47,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States ex rel. Smithsonian Institution

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Civil Action No. 17-mc-3005 (2021)

Facts

The Smithsonian Institution (Smithsonian) (plaintiff) was a collection of museums created by Congress to increase and diffuse knowledge. In 1920, the Smithsonian acquired 2,241 items from the family of Herbert Ward, a British explorer. The items included nineteen of Ward’s bronze sculptures of the Congolese people, 10 of which were life-sized or larger and weighed approximately 1,000 pounds. The agreement conveying the items to the Smithsonian required that the sculptures always be displayed alongside the rest of the Ward collection and that the collection always be on display to provide educational benefit. The agreement did not specify an alternative disposition of the items if the Smithsonian became unable to comply with the agreement’s requirements. For decades, the Ward items were on permanent display at the National Museum of Natural History (museum). In the 1980s, the museum began receiving criticism that various European items in its African culture displays, including the Ward sculptures, perpetuated negative stereotypes of African culture. It began planning an updated African-culture exhibit. In 2017, the United States (plaintiff) filed a petition on the Smithsonian’s behalf seeking judicial modification of the Ward agreement to remove the continuous-display obligation for the Ward sculptures. It argued the museum’s space constraints and modern policies, as well as the sculptures’ content, made continuous display impracticable. The museum planned to instead have an online exhibit for the Ward collection, which would allow the sculptures to be viewed alongside the rest of the collection and with supplemental information providing necessary context. The district court considered the petition.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chutkan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 926,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 926,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,003 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 926,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,400 briefs - keyed to 1,003 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,400+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,003 law school casebooks.

Case book preview