United States for the Use of Palmer Construction, Inc. v. Cal States Electric, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
940 F.2d 1260 (1991)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Cal State Electric, Inc. (CSE) (plaintiff) was the prime contractor on a project with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. CSE hired Palmer Construction, Inc. (Palmer) (defendant) as a subcontractor. The price for Palmer’s work under the subcontract was to be $235,137. Palmer completed some work and then breached. CSA had already paid Palmer $114,758.98 and was required to pay another party $126,673.56 to complete the work that was supposed to be done by Palmer, for a total of $241,432.54. The district court found that CSE had suffered $6,295.54 in damages for the amount it was required to pay in addition to the contract price and was also entitled to prejudgment interest of $1,468.88. The district court also found that the value of work that Palmer had completed was $204,845.26 and awarded Palmer the value of its work, less the amount it had already been paid, less the amount of CSE’s damages and prejudgment interest, for a total of $82,321.86. CSE appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fernandez, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.