United States Supreme Court
469 U.S. 45 (1984)
Abel (defendant) was charged with a bank robbery. One of his cohorts in the robbery, Ehle, pled guilty to the robbery and agreed to testify against Abel. At trial, Abel sought to rebut Ehle’s testimony by introducing the testimony of Mills who stated that after the robbery, Ehle admitted to Mills that Ehle intended to testify falsely against Abel to get a reduced sentence. In response to this, the prosecution sought to call Ehle back to the stand to testify that he, Able, and Mills were all part of a secret prison gang that required its members to deny its existence and commit perjury for each other. Abel objected to Ehle’s testimony about the gang. The district court admitted the testimony and convicted Abel. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.