United States v. Ali
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
799 F.3d 1008 (2015)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Amina Farah Ali and Hawo Mohamed Hassan (defendants) were originally from Somalia but became naturalized citizens of the United States. While living in Minnesota, Ali and Hassan engaged in fundraising efforts in support of al Shabaab, a foreign terrorist organization (FTO) in Somalia as designated by the United States secretary of state (secretary). Ali and Hassan were charged and convicted of materially supporting al Shabaab in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (material-support crime). Ali and Hassan appealed, arguing in part that they should be allowed to challenge the FTO designation of al Shabaab under due-process principles. Ali and Hassan also argued that allowing the secretary to designate FTOs amounted to an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gruender, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.