United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
551 F. Supp. 131 (1982)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
American Telephone & Telegraph Company (AT&T) (defendant) was an interexchange-service provider. AT&T owned the Bell Operating Companies (the operating companies), which provided local telephone services; Western Electric, which made telephones and related hardware; and Bell Labs, which conducted research. These companies often worked in conjunction. Bell Labs and Western Electric set technical standards across the telephone-services market. Western Electric supplied the operating companies with much of their necessary hardware, often counseling the operating companies about the equipment they needed to meet the standards that Bell Labs and Western Electric set. The operating companies, under pressure from AT&T, often purchased equipment from Western Electric despite other companies in the telephone-hardware market selling equivalent equipment at lower prices or before Western Electric had manufactured the needed products. The United States government (plaintiff) brought suit under § 2 of the Sherman Act, alleging that AT&T foreclosed competition in the telephone-equipment market. The government also alleged that AT&T foreclosed competition in the interexchange market by exerting control over local telephone facilities and by cross-subsidizing certain of its markets with its monopolistic local telephone services. After the district court denied AT&T’s motion to dismiss, the parties reached a consent decree that they presented to the court for approval.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Greene, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.