Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
U

United States v. An Article of Cosmetic . . . “Beacon Castile Shampoo”

1969-1974 FDLI Jud. Rec. 160 (1974)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. An Article of Cosmetic … “Beacon Castile Shampoo”

United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
1969-1974 FDLI Jud. Rec. 160 (1974)

AR

Facts

The United States sought to condemn shampoo as an adulterated substance because it contained deleterious substances that could cause injury to shampoo users. To prove that the shampoo was injurious, the United States provided evidence that temporary injury would occur to users who got the shampoo’s full strength concentrate in their eyes. The shampoo manufacturer countered that the typical use of the shampoo, namely while taking a shower, would make it very rare that the shampoo would enter a user’s eye in an undiluted form unless a user used the shampoo uncommonly close to his or her eyes.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Food and Drug Law

Key Terms