United States v. Anderegg

            3:24-cr-00050-jdp. (2025)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Anderegg

United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
            3:24-cr-00050-jdp. (2025)

Facts

After receiving a tip-off, law enforcement searched an Instagram account owned by Steven Anderegg (defendant) and found three AI-generated images of nude boys plus evidence that Anderegg had engaged in sexually explicit chats with minors. Law enforcement then searched Anderegg’s Wisconsin home, where they found electronic devices holding more than 13,000 AI-generated images, many of which depicted children engaging in sexually explicit conduct. A federal grand jury indicted Anderegg on four charges, namely (1) production of obscene images depicting minors, (2) distribution of obscene images depicting minors, (3) transfer of obscene matter to a minor under age 16, and (4) possession of obscene images depicting minors. Anderegg moved to dismiss the production and possession charges, arguing that 18 U.S.C. § 1466A, the statute under which the charges were brought, was unconstitutional as applied to him because he had the right to privately produce and possess obscene material in his own home. The district court considered Andregg’s motion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Peterson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 911,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 911,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 997 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 911,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 997 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership