United States v. Anderegg
United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
3:24-cr-00050-jdp. (2025)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
After receiving a tip-off, law enforcement searched an Instagram account owned by Steven Anderegg (defendant) and found three AI-generated images of nude boys plus evidence that Anderegg had engaged in sexually explicit chats with minors. Law enforcement then searched Anderegg’s Wisconsin home, where they found electronic devices holding more than 13,000 AI-generated images, many of which depicted children engaging in sexually explicit conduct. A federal grand jury indicted Anderegg on four charges, namely (1) production of obscene images depicting minors, (2) distribution of obscene images depicting minors, (3) transfer of obscene matter to a minor under age 16, and (4) possession of obscene images depicting minors. Anderegg moved to dismiss the production and possession charges, arguing that 18 U.S.C. § 1466A, the statute under which the charges were brought, was unconstitutional as applied to him because he had the right to privately produce and possess obscene material in his own home. The district court considered Andregg’s motion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Peterson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 911,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 997 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

