United States v. Ayala-Pizarro
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
407 F.3d 25 (1st Cir. 2005)
Luis Ayala-Pizarro (defendant) was arrested by Officer Mulero outside of a house. The police found 153 aluminum-foil packages of heroin in Ayala’s pocket. At trial, Mulero testified that the house was a known drug point. Mulero explained how drug points worked, and stated that drugs seized at drug points were generally packaged in aluminum foil. Mulero’s testimony was based on his personal experience with the specific house, drug points generally, and heroin distributed at drug points. The defense challenged Mulero’s testimony, arguing that it was expert testimony and that the prosecution had not given the required prior notice of expert testimony. The district court overruled Ayala’s objections and permitted Mulero to testify as a lay witness. Ayala was convicted, and he appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.