United States v. Bay State Ambulance and Hospital Rental Service, Inc.

874 F.2d 20 (1989)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Bay State Ambulance and Hospital Rental Service, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
874 F.2d 20 (1989)

SC

Facts

Bay State Ambulance and Hospital Rental Service, Inc. (Bay State) and John Felci (defendants) were indicted for conspiracy to commit Medicare fraud. Felci was an employee at the Quincy City Hospital and retained attorney Gideonse to represent him in the matter. Related to the indictment, Bay State’s in-house attorney, Shuman, asked Felci for documentation of the hours that he had worked for Bay State. Shuman told Felci that he was requesting the information to help answer questions posed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Felci provided a document to Shuman, which Shuman later submitted to the FBI. Felci did not ask anything of Shuman and did not pay Shuman for any legal services. Significantly, Felci did not inform Gideonse about the document until months later. The district court admitted the document into evidence, and Felci was convicted. Felci appealed, arguing that the document was protected by the joint-defense privilege, which afforded two sets of clients and their attorneys to communicate about a common legal interest without waiving attorney-client privilege.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bownes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership