United States v. Biggs (I)

2017 WL 5599467 (2017)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
U
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Biggs (I)

United States District Court for the District of Oregon
2017 WL 5599467 (2017)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Donald Biggs (defendant) was indicted for sex offenses involving minors. Biggs’s trial was scheduled to begin on December 4, 2017. In mid-August 2017, Biggs’s attorney, who was appointed to represent Biggs on May 9 and was Biggs’s third appointed counsel, began engaging in plea negotiations with the attorneys for the government (plaintiff). Biggs and the government jointly moved to continue the deadlines for pretrial filings. At the end of October, the government attorneys made a plea offer that was subject to approval from a senior supervisor. On October 30, Biggs’s counsel was advised that the plea offer had not been approved. Biggs and the government jointly moved to extend the pretrial-filings deadline. Biggs also moved to continue the trial date for 90 days and to exclude the time under the Speedy Trial Act. The government opposed the motion to continue the trial date.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Aiken, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Criminal Procedure

Key Terms