United States v. Blondek
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
741 F. Supp. 116 (1990)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
Two United States citizens (defendants) allegedly bribed Canadian officials Donald Castle and Darrell Lowry (defendants). All four people were charged in federal district court with conspiring to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Castle and Lowry moved to dismiss the charges against them, arguing that because the FCPA does not penalize foreign officials who accept improper payments that are made in violation of the FCPA, Castle and Lowry could not be charged with conspiracy to violate the FCPA. Castle and Lowry also provided evidence that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police were actively investigating the same allegations and that Castle and Lowry would likely face charges in Canada.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sanders, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.