From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
United States v. Brackeen
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, En Banc
969 F.2d 827 (1992)
Brackeen was charged with aiding and abetting another in an armed bank robbery. At trial, Brackeen took the stand and the prosecution sought to introduce into evidence Brackeen’s two prior convictions of bank robberies. The two previous bank robberies did not involve any dishonest acts outside of the crimes themselves. The trial court refused to allow the evidence under 609(a)(1) because the probative value did not outweigh the prejudicial effect. However, the trial court admitted the evidence under 609(a)(2), determining a bank robbery to be a per se crime of dishonesty. Brackeen appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.