From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
United States v. Bradley
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
644 F.3d 1213 (11th Cir. 2011)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Law enforcement executed a search warrant for Bio-Med’s (defendant) headquarters and seized all files relating to Bio-Med’s business for a number of years. At trial, Bio-Med filed a motion to suppress the seized evidence on the grounds that the search warrant was overly broad. The affidavit in support of the search warrant claimed that fraud spread to Bio-Med’s principals, officers, suppliers, and a number of other entities with which Bio-Med conducted business. The district court denied the motion to suppress. Bio-Med appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
