From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
United States v. Brooks
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
610 F.3d 1186 (2010)
N.K., a 16-year-old, and R.O., a 15-year-old, escaped from an Arizona juvenile detention center and met Depaul Brooks and Uawndre Fields (plaintiffs). Fields was a pimp who worked out of San Diego. R.O. told Brooks and Fields that R.O. and N.K. were minors. Brooks and Fields bought bus tickets to San Diego for N.K. and R.O. under false names. Fields purchased provocative clothing for R.O. and N.K. and posted prostitution advertisements online for R.O. and N.K. R.O. engaged in several acts of prostitution while in San Diego. Brooks and Fields then drove R.O. and N.K. back to Arizona and dropped R.O. off in an area known for prostitution. N.K. was taken back to Brooks and Fields’s hotel room. R.O. was arrested after a patrol officer observed she was underage. Using information obtained from R.O., Arizona police located and arrested Brooks and Fields. The federal government (defendant) charged Brooks and Fields with (1) child sex trafficking; and (2) interstate transport of minors for the purpose of prostitution. During the trial, the court admitted expert testimony from Detective Christi Hein, who testified about the prostitution business and the relationship between prostitutes and pimps. Detective Hein had conducted 25 full-scale child-prostitution investigations, had extensive training on child prostitution, and frequently worked undercover to gather evidence about child prostitution and trafficking operations. Brooks and Fields were convicted after a jury trial. Brooks and Fields appealed, arguing that (1) Detective Hein’s testimony was improperly admitted; and (2) there was insufficient evidence to convict.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Canby, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.