United States v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
578 F.2d 1280 (1978)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Robert Brown (defendant) was convicted of committing securities fraud in violation of § 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933. Brown appealed, arguing that § 24 of the act—the criminal-penalty provision for § 17(a)—requires willful conduct. Per Brown, the government (plaintiff) thus had to prove he had actual knowledge that the items he fraudulently sold were securities within the meaning of the act.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ingram, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.