United States v. Butterworth
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
511 F.3d 71 (2007)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Ryan Butterworth (defendant) was indicted by a grand jury for crimes related to drug trafficking. Crystal Alexander, Butterworth’s girlfriend, had testified against Butterworth before the grand jury, providing information about the operations of Butterworth’s drug trafficking. At trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) called Alexander as a witness, but her testimony was not the same as that before the grand jury. Alexander still spoke of the drug operation but contradicted her grand-jury testimony in terms of volume of drugs and money she had seen, frequency of sales, and other details of the operation. The trial court permitted the prosecution to cross-examine Alexander about her grand-jury testimony. Butterworth was convicted, and he appealed, arguing that Alexander’s grand-jury testimony was inadmissible hearsay.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Boudin, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
