United States v. Carrillo
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
981 F.2d 772 (1993)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Carrillo (defendant) was charged with distribution of heroin and cocaine based on an undercover officer’s testimony that he bought the drugs from Carrillo. The officer testified that he bought narcotics from Carrillo on a particular street in San Antonio and that the narcotics were in a balloon. Carrillo defended himself on the grounds that the officer mistook his identity as he was actually a few blocks away. In order to prove that the officer had the right person, the prosecution presented the testimony of two other officers who claimed that they witnessed Carrillo selling drugs on two other occasions. As a result, Carrillo was convicted. He appealed on the grounds that the testimony of the other officers was inadmissible because they were improperly testifying to other, previous acts of Carrillo to show conformity to those acts in the present case.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (DeMoss, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.